Democracy Now: More Than 1.1 Million Sign Petition Supporting Impeachment of Trump

On Tuesday, former CIA Director John Brennan testified to the House Intelligence Committee that he had growing concerns last year that Trump’s campaign was guilty of potential collusion with Russian officials to influence the 2016 election. In response, Trump hired a lawyer to represent him during the ongoing investigation, which led to growing calls for Trump’s impeachment.

This morning, John Bonifaz, co-founder and president of Free Speech for People joined Texas Congress member Al Green on Democracy Now! to discuss the campaign and the mounting evidence for impeachment.

Continue reading…

The Bill Press Show: Rep. Al Green & John Bonifaz Talk Impeachment

“I do admire greatly, what my friend is doing. He and his cohorts have given the American people a means by which they can participate in this process. It is a participatory democracy, and I encourage people to go online and to make your voices heard. This is a way for your to participate. Sign the petition. It will be the will of the American people that will drive the will of Congress. If the American people speak up and stand up, and have impeachment town hall meetings, you don’t have to wait on a congress person to have an impeachment town hall meeting, you can call one yourself.” — Rep. Al Green (TX-D, 9th District)

Today, Congressman Al Green, Representing Texas’ 9th District and John Bonifaz, Co-Founder & President at Free Speech for People joined The Bill Press Show to discuss the campaign to impeach President Trump. Watch the full segment above.

Listen: John Bonifaz on “The Bill Newman Show”

John Bonifaz joined “The Bill Newman Show”, a Northampton MA radio show on May 19, 2017. Listen to the full interview below.

Rising Up With Sonali: Trump Presidency In Deep Trouble As Talk Of Impeachment Grows

Sonali Kohlhatkar, host of Los Angeles-based “Rising Up With Sonali“,  speaks with  Free Speech For People Legal Director, Ron Fein on what’s next for Trump’s impeachment following explosive new details by the Washington Post.

Last week, The Post revealed that President Trump shared classified information about the Islamic State to Russian officials Sergey Lavrov and Sergei Kislyak during a meeting earlier this month in the White House. Trump has confirmed sharing this information, but defended his right to do so, with Russian President Vladimir Putin offering to share a full transcript of the conversations with Congress.

We Need an Impeachment Investigation in Parallel with the Special Prosecutor’s Investigation

This original article was posted to the Free Speech For People blog by Legal Director, Ron Fein. 

Recently, the Deputy Attorney General appointed Robert Mueller, a longtime career prosecutor, as a special prosecutor (technically, “special counsel”) to investigate potential criminal violations, including obstruction of justice, by the Trump campaign or administration. But we still need to press forward with the demand that the U.S. House of Representatives launch an impeachment investigation, for three main reasons.

1. The special prosecutor’s investigation will be narrower than an impeachment investigation.

Under the Constitution, Congress may impeach the president for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The phrase “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not precisely defined, but includes grave abuses of public power or violations of public trust.

The special prosecutor’s investigation is more limited. He must focus on violations of federal criminal statutes. Not all “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” violate specific federal criminal statutes. For example, there are several federal criminal statutes defining obstruction of justice. But there are other impeachable forms of obstruction that may not be covered by those criminal statutes—such as firing the official overseeing the investigation. Similarly, violating the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause was specifically cited by the Founders as grounds for impeachment. But it’s not covered by a specific criminal statute.

2. The special prosecutor will be constrained by the rules of federal court.

The special prosecutor must focus on criminal violations that he can prove in federal court. This involves issues that are simply irrelevant to a congressional impeachment proceeding. For example, the Federal Rules of Evidence contain detailed rules about when documents can, and cannot, be used to prove a point in court. If Mueller finds a bombshell document that doesn’t fit into one of the hearsay exceptions, he can’t use it in court. That means he can’t even bring the charge. He could get stalled trying to work around this technical problem.

The House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment investigation is not subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence. It can consider whatever evidence the committee finds appropriate.

3. The special prosecutor’s investigation will be conducted in secret.

We will likely not know anything of the special prosecutor’s investigation, except through leaks and rumors, until it finishes, which could take years. A congressional impeachment investigation, by contrast, will be conducted in the open, laying forth the evidence for the American public as it develops.

Bottom line: Mueller’s appointment is a significant development. But Congress must not use it as an excuse to shirk its duty to conduct an independent impeachment investigation. These are parallel, complementary tracks, and we cannot let Congress hide behind the special prosecutor.